Skip to the page
In Your Name

DW-NOMINATE

A statistical estimate of where a legislator sits relative to everyone else in the same chamber, computed from who votes with whom — never from anyone’s reading of the bills. Published by Voteview, the method is the standard in political science. The number has no units and no meaning outside its own chamber: it says a member votes more like this group than that one, and nothing about whether they were right. It is a position in a voting coalition, not agreement with a programme. Because it is built from who votes with whom, a member who rarely departs from their party sits at that party’s edge of the scale, and one who departs is drawn toward the middle — the scale cannot see which direction the departure came from. In the 119th House that places Speaker-level leadership among the most liberal Democrats and several of the caucus’s most vocal left dissenters nearer the centre. It is a fact about the measure and not about what those members believe, and this site publishes Voteview’s number rather than adjusting it toward what a reader expects. The method also publishes a second dimension, which separates members within each party rather than between them. Voteview does not state what it captures, and nor does this site: a seat’s page gives the figure and where it places that member among their own caucus, with no word for either end.

One tick per House member, 450 of them, at their first-dimension estimate in the 119th Congress; the rule is the median, +0.19. The lowest is -0.76 and the highest +0.97.
One tick per senator, 105 of them, at their first-dimension estimate in the 119th Congress; the rule is the median, +0.37. The lowest is -0.74 and the highest +0.94.

See it in use.

This word appears on a seat’s page with the figure it describes and the document behind it.

Open the map